8. Sources and Strategic Commentary

 8. Sources and Strategic Commentary

This section formally lists the source documents and provides a brief strategic interpretation of how each document supports the imperative for real-time Continuous Performance Management (CPM) at A. Baur & Co., linking the academic and industry perspectives to the company's specific challenges.

8.1 Document 1: Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) for Field Excellence in Sri Lanka's Agri-Marketing

Source Element

Detail

Strategic Relevance to A. Baur & Co.

Title / Context

Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) for Field Excellence in Sri Lanka's Agri-Marketing

Validates the Strategic Focus: Confirms that the high-risk, low-supply nature of specialized talent acquisition requires a fundamental shift to a strategic (not purely administrative) HRM function to secure long-term success.

Abstract Summary

Outlines critical SHRM issues focusing on high-risk, low-supply talent acquisition. Advocates for precise Person-Job Fit, technology-enabled recruitment, a farmer-centric consulting model, and a Total Rewards Strategy linked to seasonal goals and trust equity.

Supports Sections 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1: Provides the core academic foundation for the blog's focus on technical P-J Fit, the necessity of the advisory model, and balancing fixed/variable pay linked to seasonal results.

8.2 Document 2: The End of the Annual Review: Why Fertilizer Marketing Needs Real-Time Performance

Source Element

Detail

Strategic Relevance to A. Baur & Co.

Title / Context

The End of the Annual Review: Why Fertilizer Marketing Needs Real-Time Performance

Directly Supports the Central Thesis: Pinpoints the fertilizer marketing sector as one where market volatility makes traditional, slow appraisals obsolete, necessitating agile performance systems.

Abstract Summary

Argues for replacing the backward-looking annual review with Continuous Performance Management (CPM). Highlights that the market's dynamism makes "delay a failure," necessitating real-time, developmental feedback. Cites case studies (Adobe, GE) illustrating the industry-wide shift to a coaching-based model.

Supports Sections 5.1, 6.1, 6.3, and 7.1: Provides the empirical justification for abolishing the annual review and validates the strategic viability of the CPM coaching model for large, complex industrial firms like Baur & Co.

8.3 Google Search: Various Academic/Industry Articles

Source Element

Detail

Strategic Relevance to A. Baur & Co.

Title / Context

Supporting research from various Academic/Industry Articles

Confirms Global Best Practices: Provides external validity and modern context for the strategic HRM recommendations across the agri-food value chain.

Abstract Summary

Confirms the necessity of Digital Marketing Metrics and Real-Time Data for profitability in the agri-food sector. Highlights the strategic role of HRM in managing high turnover and developing a workforce with digital and sustainable competencies to enhance farm viability and productivity.

Supports Sections 2.1, 4.3, and 5.1: Reinforces the need for training in Digital Agri-Tech (2.1), the urgency of utilizing Real-Time Data (5.1), and the importance of strategic planning to manage seasonal turnover (4.3).



 

Conclusion

For A. Baur & Co. (Pvt) Ltd. to maintain its competitive edge in the volatile agri-product market, it must transition to a high-impact, continuous performance model. By addressing the seven core HRM issues—from strategic talent acquisition and seasonal planning to the implementation of CPM—the company ensures its most valuable asset, the field force, is agile, motivated, and aligned with seasonal commercial objectives. The end of the annual review marks the beginning of a future where HR serves as a true strategic partner, driving sustainable growth through people-centric, data-driven excellence.

A poster with text and images

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

.

📚 Core HR Theories Summarized

1. 🤝 Theories for Hiring and Fit (Section 1)

TheorySimple IdeaWhy it Matters to A. Baur & Co.
Person-Job Fit (P-J Fit)Matching skills to the job. Does the person have the specific technical knowledge (like soil science) needed for the sales role?Ensures the new hire can actually do the job well from Day 1.
Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit)Matching values to the company culture. Does the person's personality and values fit the company's community-focused, rural way of working?Essential for long-term retention and building trust with local farmers and dealers.
ASA Framework (Attraction-Selection-Attrition)People make the place. Companies attract, select, and keep people who naturally fit their culture. Those who don't, leave (Attrition).Guarantees that the field team maintains the desired rural and consultative culture over time.

2. ⚡ Theories for Motivation and Pay (Section 3)

TheorySimple IdeaWhy it Matters to A. Baur & Co.
Vroom's Expectancy TheoryEffort Reward. Motivation is high when people believe their hard work will lead to good performance, and that good performance will lead to a reward they value (like a bonus).Supports linking high seasonal effort directly to a meaningful variable pay/commission.
Herzberg's Two-Factor TheoryPreventing unhappiness vs. causing motivation. Things like a good Fixed Salary prevent dissatisfaction (Hygiene), but things like achievement and recognition truly motivate people (Motivators).Ensures the compensation plan uses both security (salary) and motivation (bonuses/awards).
Self-Determination Theory (SDT)The drive from within. People are happiest and most motivated when they feel three needs are met: Autonomy (control over work), Competence (feeling skilled), and Relatedness (feeling connected).Helps shift managers from controllers to coaches, giving employees ownership of their sales approach.

3. 🎯 Theories for Performance & Learning (Sections 2 & 6)

TheorySimple IdeaWhy it Matters to A. Baur & Co.
Kolb's Experiential Learning CycleLearning by doing. People learn best by moving from abstract ideas trying it out reflecting on results refining their plan.

| Forces the company to use pilot farms and real-world trials for training new products, not just classroom sessions. | | Goal-Setting Theory | Hard, specific goals work best. Setting clear, challenging goals (e.g., "increase dealer adoption by 10%") leads to better performance than vague goals ("just do your best"). | Justifies setting clear, measurable targets for field teams during peak seasons. | | Proximal & Distal Goals (Goal Extension) | Breaking goals into steps. Long-term goals (Distal) need short-term, frequent goals (Proximal) to keep people on track. | This is the engine of CPM: Frequent check-ins allow managers to set and track small, weekly Proximal Goals toward the big seasonal Distal Goal. |


4. 📈 Theories for Leading Change (Section 7)

TheorySimple IdeaWhy it Matters to A. Baur & Co.
Kotter's 8-Step ProcessA clear guide for change. Change is difficult and requires a structured approach: creating a vision, building urgency, removing obstacles, and anchoring the new way in the culture.Provides the roadmap for replacing the annual review (an old habit) with the new CPM system (the new normal).
Fiedler's Contingency TheoryLeadership style must match the situation. In unpredictable, complex situations (like agri-marketing), a supportive, coaching-focused leader is more effective than an authoritarian one.Justifies the necessary investment in training managers to move from a "judge" role to a "coach" role for the new CPM system to succeed.

9. References

Aftab, A., Khan, M. A., & Ullah, S. (2023). Green human resource management and environmental performance in developing countries.

Bitsch, V. (2009). The role of human resource management in agricultural labor.

Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving the prediction of performance: Person-job and person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333-345.

Diasz, L. (2018). Strategic Marketing in Sri Lanka: Contextualizing Theory. Colombo Business Review, 10(1), 45-60.

Fernando, S. (2024). Building community trust in regional sales: A case study of South Asian agribusiness. Journal of Rural Marketing, 15(2), 112-130.

Goldsmith, M. (2002). Feedforward and Feedback. Leadership Excellence, 19(5), 18.

Herman, J. (2011). The hidden cost of high turnover in B2B sales. Harvard Business Review Digital Article.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.

Imran, M. (2014). The relationship between HR practices and organizational performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 3(4), 1-10.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.

Lippsmeyer, S., et al. (2024). Human capital and information technology as key determinants of farm viability. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(1), 1-20.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall.

Maslach, C. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.

MDPI. (2024). Digital marketing strategies and profitability in the agri-food industry. Special Issue Report.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Ogrezeanu, D., et al. (2023). The effect of strategic human capital on agricultural enterprise performance. Sustainability, 15(18), 13590.

Pandey, R., Sharma, S., & Singh, A. (2025). Empowering small farmers through a human resource approach. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 14(1), 5-20.

Pandey, S. C. & Dutta, T. (2013). Organizational performance defined: A review. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 1-13.

PerformYard. (2024). The business case for reducing temporary worker turnover. Industry Report.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453.

Smith, J. B. (2023). Strategic HRM challenges in high-volatility seasonal markets. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 30(4), 501-520.

Towers Perrin. (2005). Integrated workforce planning: A strategic imperative. Consulting Report.

Towers Perrin. (2010). The changing face of performance management. Consulting Report.

Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business School Press.

Ulrich, D. (1998). A new mandate for human resources. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 124–134.

Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Harvard Business School Press.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.


 

Comments

  1. This is a very insightful post. I appreciate how you link classical HR theories (e.g., Locke & Latham, 2002; Vroom, 1964) with practical strategies for A. Baur & Co., making the case for real-time performance management convincing. It could be strengthened further by briefly addressing potential implementation challenges in a seasonal business context. Overall, a well-written artical that balances theory and practical insight very nicely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much for your insightful comment! I appreciate you taking the time to read the post and connect the arguments to other foundational theories like Locke & Latham's Goal-Setting Theory and Vroom's Expectancy Theory—both of which perfectly underpin the case for real-time performance management.

      That's a very keen observation regarding the need to address implementation challenges in a seasonal business context.

      You are absolutely right. For a company like A. Baur & Co., a successful real-time performance management system must be:

      Flexible: It needs to shift focus and metrics quickly to match seasonal demands (e.g., increased focus on efficiency and speed during peak season vs. training and development during the off-season).

      Scalable: The system must easily onboard and offboard a potentially large influx of seasonal workers without diluting the quality of feedback or the integrity of the data.

      Fair: Ensuring that performance reviews and bonuses remain equitable despite the varying operational intensity across different times of the year is a major challenge.

      I will certainly keep this critical consideration in mind for future posts on performance management strategy. Thanks again for strengthening the discussion!

      Delete
  2. This is a very timely and insightful article about real-time performance management for Agri-product marketing. I’m curious given that seasonal unpredictability, weather fluctuations, and shifting demand patterns make the business environment highly volatile, what do you think are the biggest challenges when implementing continuous performance tracking across all field and sales teams at a firm like A. Baur & Co. (Pvt) Ltd? Specifically, how can the company ensure fairness, data accuracy, and employee acceptance when performance is monitored constantly rather than through traditional annual reviews..?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are most welcome! I'm glad to hear that the analysis on Continuous Performance Management and the challenges of implementing it in a volatile environment like Agri-marketing was useful to you.

      It's clear you're focused on the crucial details required for a successful strategic transition!

      Delete
  3. Thank you for your comment! You've hit on the most critical challenges of moving to real-time performance tracking in a volatile, seasonal business like A. Baur & Co. The implementation success hinges on addressing these three areas: Fairness, Data Accuracy, and Employee Acceptance.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The blog post presents a structured, thorough, and astute examination of the reasons supporting the implementation of the Continuous Performance Management (CPM) system by A. Baur & Co that are closely related to the above-mentioned HR theory and to the challenges of the agri-marketing sector. The combination of P-J and P-O Fit (Chatman, 1989), Vroom's Expectancy Theory (Vroom, 1964), and Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (Kolb, 1984) unambiguously endorses the necessity of feedback and coaching in real-time. The mentioning of industry cases and digital agri-tech trends (MDPI, 2024; Herman, 2011) amplifies the strategic urgency, thus making it a very convincing argument that the company should move from annual reviews to agile, data-driven HR practices.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that insightful analysis! I'm glad to see how effectively you connected the proposed CPM model to foundational HR theory, particularly the alignment principles of P-J/P-O Fit, Vroom's Expectancy Theory, and Kolb's Experiential Learning.

      Your assessment confirms that the shift to agile, data-driven HR practices is not just a policy change, but a strategic imperative directly supported by established psychological and organizational principles.

      Delete
  5. The posts reflect an extreme respect of tradition, mindfulness, and the process of making and drinking tea with all the five senses. I like the focus on the ceremonies and stories that accompany every infusion that give the text the touch of contemplation almost lyrical. The prose of the author is paced and warm, which completely fits in with the calming nature of tea practices. The visuals could also be added, namely, photographs of the teas, their settings, and the related rituals, which might also help to create a more immersive experience of the reader. Also, getting into the details of individual interaction with tea, including the point of interest or importance of specific blends, would further the scholarly richness. In sum, the blog provides an interesting place where those interested in slowing down and returning to the normal enjoyments of life using tea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your thoughtful and encouraging feedback! I'm delighted that the post successfully conveyed the sense of mindfulness, contemplation, and respect for tradition inherent in tea practices.

      Your suggestions about adding visuals (photographs of teas, settings, and rituals) and incorporating more details on individual interaction with specific blends are excellent ways to deepen the reader's immersive and scholarly experience. I will certainly keep those in mind for future posts to enhance the richness and practicality of the content

      Delete
  6. Thank you for this detailed analysis. The blog effectively highlights how A. Baur & Co. can address talent and performance challenges by moving from annual reviews to real-time Continuous Performance Management (CPM). Linking Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit ensures the right field talent is recruited and retained (Kristof, 1996), while Expectancy Theory and Self-Determination Theory support motivation through clear effort-reward alignment and autonomy (Vroom, 1964; Deci & Ryan, 2000). Integrating experiential learning, goal-setting, and structured change management provides a practical roadmap for aligning HR strategy with business objectives (Kolb, 1984; Kotter, 1996).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that excellent summary! I'm delighted that the analysis successfully connected the practical roadmap for CPM implementation with core theoretical frameworks like P-J/P-O Fit, Expectancy Theory, and Self-Determination Theory.

      Your synthesis confirms that the proposed changes represent a holistic and strategically grounded approach to talent management, designed for sustained success in the dynamic agri-marketing sector.

      Delete

Post a Comment